The nation’s highest court will not be weighing in on whether the real estate trade group’s Clear Cooperation Policy violates antitrust laws. The case proceeds in a lower court.
Source: Inman News
US Supreme Court denies NAR petition in pocket listing case
More from antitrustMore posts in antitrust »
- FTC sues Zillow, Redfin over $100M rental syndication deal
- Here’s what comes next in the Compass-Anywhere deal
- Compass’ merger with Anywhere Inc. will reshape global real estate
- Compass hires former NAR lead attorney as it doubles down on legal battles
- NAR fires back at Mauricio Umansky’s PLS in new legal filing
More from ccpMore posts in ccp »
- Commission lawsuits? AI? Clear Cooperation? Fuggedaboutit
- Compass agrees to share its exclusive listings, with 2 caveats
- Dwiggins: Zillow understands the consumer better than NAR
- Dwiggins on Compass, Zillow and real estate ‘Armageddon’
- With an eye on future lawsuits, Compass formally repudiates CCP in letter to NAR and MLSs
More from Clear Cooperation PolicyMore posts in Clear Cooperation Policy »
More from Mantill WilliamsMore posts in Mantill Williams »
- NAR perks and lavish spending spotlight of New York Times report
- California commission lawsuit filed against NAR and 35 other entities
- Homeseller sues Nevada Realtors, NAR after $40K commission bill
- A Maryland homeowner just filed yet another commission lawsuit
- ‘Modest’ commission proposals are insufficient, says watchdog
More from MLS & AssociationsMore posts in MLS & Associations »
- Get ready to get hit with a tsunami of real estate consolidation
- What the Compass-Anywhere deal means for the future of MLSs
- Don’t just read the news. Be part of the story with Inman’s Tip Line
- Compass-Anywhere merger FAQ: How will it change real estate?
- Associations: Want to add value, relevance? Raise the bar on events
More from NARMore posts in NAR »
- Lingering questions, NAR opinion, new lawsuit: Inman Top 5
- Jason Oppenheim respects the Compass deal, but says he’s ‘not happy about it’
- Get ready to get hit with a tsunami of real estate consolidation
- What the Compass-Anywhere deal means for the future of MLSs
- Compass-Anywhere merger FAQ: How will it change real estate?
More from national association of realtorsMore posts in national association of realtors »
- Trump’s Fannie, Freddie public offering might not have much impact on mortgage rates
- Lingering questions, NAR opinion, new lawsuit: Inman Top 5
- Jason Oppenheim respects the Compass deal, but says he’s ‘not happy about it’
- Get ready to get hit with a tsunami of real estate consolidation
- What the Compass-Anywhere deal means for the future of MLSs
More from plsMore posts in pls »
- Drunken gunman, new legal filing, Roseanne Barr: Inman’s Top 5
- Umansky threatens to sue NAR as pocket listing pressure mounts
- Court revives antitrust claims against NAR in pocket listing suit
- Here’s how to avoid the most-dreaded new agent question
- Pocket listing suit against NAR ‘paused’ for settlement talks
More from pocket listingsMore posts in pocket listings »
- Engel & Völkers’ CEO: ‘We’re focused on culture over indiscriminate scale’
- NAR fires back at Mauricio Umansky’s PLS in new legal filing
- Brad Inman to agents: AI will eliminate the great Clear Cooperation debate
- Competition, discretion drive lux agents to embrace private listings
- Mauricio Umansky’s ThePLS.com sues NAR over private listings
More from SelectMore posts in Select »
- The anatomy of a viral real estate post (that also gets you clients)
- Trump’s Fannie, Freddie public offering might not have much impact on mortgage rates
- Man attacks real estate agent at vacant property outside LA
- Massachusetts broker arrested, accused of embezzling $11.6M
- This real estate exec says artificial intelligence is ‘lying’ to consumers. Here’s his solution
More from Supreme CourtMore posts in Supreme Court »
- Supreme Court not ready to let Trump boot Fed Governor Lisa Cook
- SCOTUS upheld the TikTok ban. Here’s what agents should do now
- Supreme Court denies NAR’s appeal request in DOJ case
- Supreme Court to decide whether to hear NAR case against DOJ
- DOJ tells Supreme Court it has a right to investigate NAR policies
More from the nlsMore posts in the nls »
More from the plsMore posts in the pls »
Be First to Comment