The homesellers object that the deals’ payout is “far too low” for the “massive” number of injured parties and that franchisees should be required to implement practice changes.
Source: Inman News
Sellers appeal Keller Williams, Anywhere, RE/MAX settlements
Published in antitrust, Anywhere, appeal, Brokerage, commission suits, keller williams, knie & shealy, NAR, national association of realtors, re/max, Select and sitzer/burnett
More from antitrustMore posts in antitrust »
- Real CEO talks growth in hard times — and how everyone loses in real estate ‘wars’
- NAR repeals policy requiring membership for MLS access
- Compass targets Zillow’s warnings to agents in new brief
- Supreme Court just might give REX another shot at NAR, Zillow
- FTC sues Zillow, Redfin over $100M rental syndication deal
More from AnywhereMore posts in Anywhere »
- Shutdown blip, or worrying trend? Agent pipelines thin in November
- Jason Oppenheim: Private listings could take real estate ‘back to the Dark Ages’
- Will Anywhere merger launch M&A arms race? It’s not yet clear: Intel
- Despite unease, Compass poised to retain most Anywhere agents
- Meet the brokerage turning agent support into profit
More from appealMore posts in appeal »
- New York brokers double down on FARE Act opposition as city fights back
- NAR settlement appeals add up as law professor signals new objection
- ‘Unconstitutional’ court order risks NAR deal on appeal: Professor
- Seller who balked at inadequate payout appeals commission deal
- Buyer appeals Keller Williams, Anywhere, RE/MAX settlements
More from BrokerageMore posts in Brokerage »
- Redfin on 2026: Affordability improves, sales rise only slightly
- Dual licensing is on the rise. Is it the right move for your business?
- Future-proof your digital footprint for 2026 (and beyond)
- Change strategy as the market shifts to win the listings long game
- Listing leverage: How to win the game of securing sellers
More from commission suitsMore posts in commission suits »
- Howard Hanna in open rebellion against Clear Cooperation Policy
- NAR’s new law firm for antitrust suits charges up to $3K an hour
- Judge rebuffs bid to transfer case over alleged eXp ‘sweetheart deal’
- The CCP illusion: NAR’s Jedi mind trick on a failing policy
- Weichert and eXp continue fight against Gibson commission claims
More from keller williamsMore posts in keller williams »
More from NARMore posts in NAR »
More from national association of realtorsMore posts in national association of realtors »
More from re/maxMore posts in re/max »
- Through the bathroom door: What 3D tours reveal about buyers today
- Will Anywhere merger launch M&A arms race? It’s not yet clear: Intel
- 3 opportunities agents miss without a top global brand
- NAR scores a victory in buyer commission lawsuit
- New LGBTQ+ Alliance president talks about ‘opportunity in the chaos’
More from SelectMore posts in Select »
- This team is jumping on the private listing platform trend (EXCLUSIVE)
- Redfin on 2026: Affordability improves, sales rise only slightly
- Dual licensing is on the rise. Is it the right move for your business?
- Future-proof your digital footprint for 2026 (and beyond)
- Change strategy as the market shifts to win the listings long game
More from sitzer/burnettMore posts in sitzer/burnett »
- Industry shocked as Realtors say no to referral-fee transparency
- With an eye on future lawsuits, Compass formally repudiates CCP in letter to NAR and MLSs
- This June, Inman is celebrating Today’s Buyer Agent
- NAR considers Code of Ethics changes regarding speech
- NAR’s new law firm for antitrust suits charges up to $3K an hour
Be First to Comment