The dual hypotheses that low-fee brokerages aren’t sustainable, and that their agents are less productive, are false, Mike DelPrete writes.
Source: Inman News
DelPrete: Are agents at low-fee brokerages any less productive?
Published in Brokerage, brokerage profitability, Inman Intel and mike delprete
More from BrokerageMore posts in Brokerage »
- Dawn of a new era: Here’s how NAR says it’s changing for its members
- 5 copy-and-paste direct-mail campaigns that will fuel your best year ever in 2026
- NAR economist predicts post-shutdown real estate ‘boom’
- FICO scores, magic phrases, earnings digs: Inman Top 5
- Where else is Zillow not enforcing its private listing ban?
More from brokerage profitabilityMore posts in brokerage profitability »
More from Inman IntelMore posts in Inman Intel »
- Despite unease, Compass poised to retain most Anywhere agents
- New client leads, murky waters: October’s mixed bag for real estate
- Commissions held up in Year 1. Would a seller’s shift upend them?
- The ‘rate lock-in’ barrier is cracking — and not where you might expect
- The MLS isn’t dead yet, but brokers hedge bets with private listings
More from mike delpreteMore posts in mike delprete »
- KW’s Jason Abrams on the ‘paradox’ of artificial intelligence
- Zillow may be surrounded, but it’s not checkmate just yet
- Are commissions still falling? What Intel’s watching in weeks ahead
- Zillow begins sending warnings to brokers ahead of private listing ban
- Checkmate or alienate? Reactions mixed as firms align with Zillow
Be First to Comment